9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the deduction allowable for donations made by an assessee. Analysis: The case involved the interpretation of Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961, specifically focusing on the deduction allowable for donations made by an assessee. The primary issue was whether the assessee was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 22,169 only, being 55% of 10% of the total income, as held by the Appellate Tribunal, or a larger sum. The Tribunal's decision was based on a restrictive interpretation of sub-section (4) of Section 80G, limiting the deduction to only 55% of 10% of the total income. However, the High Court disagreed with this interpretation, emphasizing that the Tribunal had misconstrued the scope of sub-sections (1), (2), (3), and (4) of Section 80G. The High Court analyzed the relevant provisions of Section 80G, highlighting that the deduction allowable for donations under sub-section (1) is either 50% for companies or 55% for other assessees of the aggregate of the sums donated under sub-section (2). It was clarified that the deduction is subject to the provisions of Section 80G, and a ceiling limit is imposed by sub-section (4) on the deductible amounts donated for specific purposes mentioned in the Act. The Court emphasized that sub-section (4) is a qualification attached to the deduction permissible under sub-section (1) and applies only to donations for certain purposes, limiting the deduction to 10% of the gross total income or two hundred thousand rupees, whichever is less. The Court concluded that the Tribunal's decision to restrict the deduction to 55% of 10% of the total income was incorrect. It reiterated that the assessee was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 40,308.40, which represents 10% of the gross total income, and not Rs. 22,169. The judgment clarified that the concept of a 55% deduction is mentioned in sub-section (1), while sub-section (4) prescribes the ceiling limit at 10% of the total income for specific donations. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the correct deduction amount was Rs. 40,308.40, not Rs. 22,169, as determined by the Tribunal. In conclusion, the High Court answered the question in the negative and in favor of the assessee, directing that the assessee would have costs from the revenue, including an advocate's fee of Rs. 250.
|
