1979 (1) TMI 43 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
Validity of reassessment under section 147(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

The case involved a reference at the instance of the Commissioner under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, questioning the validity of a reassessment made under section 147(b) of the Act. The assessee, a company, owned preference shares in another company, from which tax was deducted at source but not paid to the Central Government as required by law. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) initiated proceedings under section 147(b) and withdrew the tax credit initially given to the assessee (company) based on this discrepancy (paragraphs 2-3).

The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), arguing that the company was not at fault, had produced the necessary certificate for tax deduction, and should not be denied the tax credit. The AAC accepted the principal contentions and held that the ITO had no jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under section 147(b. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the AAC's conclusions, leading to the reference before the High Court (paragraphs 4-5).

The High Court analyzed the provisions of section 147(b) and Explanation 1 to determine if the reassessment was warranted. The Court noted that income chargeable to tax must have escaped assessment for section 147(b) to apply. The Court examined whether the excess tax credit given to the assessee fell within the scope of "income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment" as per Explanation 1, particularly item (c) relating to excessive relief under the Act (paragraphs 6-9).

Referring to a Supreme Court decision, the Court concluded that the alleged excess tax credit did not constitute excessive relief on the assessee's income, as the original assessment figures remained unchanged. Therefore, the Court held that section 147(b) was not applicable in this case. Consequently, the Court answered the reference question in the negative, in favor of the assessee, and directed the Commissioner to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee (paragraphs 10-11).