Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2019 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (1) TMI 804 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Petition for mandamus to collect TDS information and initiate action under Income Tax Act.
2. Request for general directions to ensure compliance with Income Tax Act by the employer.
3. Allegation of misappropriation of public funds and request for prosecution under IPC.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the tax authorities to collect Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) information from the employer for the relevant financial year and issue Form 16 for timely filing of Income Tax Return. The petitioner's main grievance was resolved as he received the required documents. However, he urged the Income Tax Department to take action against the employer under Section 276B of the Income Tax Act to prevent future non-compliance. The petitioner highlighted the outstanding tax recoveries and the need for effective measures to address non-issuance of TDS certificates by the employer, emphasizing the potential misappropriation of public funds if taxes are not deposited with the government. He also suggested initiating prosecution under Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The court noted that since the petitioner's primary concern was addressed, further examination of the petition was not warranted. The court indicated that any additional submissions or reliefs sought by the petitioner would fall under public interest litigation, a category different from the present petition. Reference was made to a previous court order highlighting certain observations, and it was expected that the Income Tax Department would consider these observations appropriately. The court emphasized that decisions regarding the initiation of proceedings under Section 276B of the Income Tax Act were within the department's jurisdiction, and it was anticipated that the department would act based on the available facts.

3. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed by the court. The judgment concluded with the court's observations regarding the resolved nature of the petitioner's main grievance, the department's awareness of relevant court orders, and the expectation for appropriate actions by the Income Tax Department in response to the issues raised. The court's decision to dismiss the petition signified that, in the current circumstances, no further legal intervention or relief was deemed necessary based on the resolved nature of the petitioner's initial concern.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates