9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Reopening of assessment u/s 147(b) for assessment year 1967-68, assessability of gains from sale of shade trees u/s 45 for various assessment years.
Reopening of assessment for 1967-68: The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued a notice u/s 148 proposing to recompute the income as the sale proceeds of shade trees were not specifically shown in the profit and loss statement. The ITO found that the entire sum realized from the sale of trees was liable for capital gains tax. The assessee contended that the ITO could not reopen the assessment as the amount was admitted in the profit and loss account. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) upheld the capital gains treatment relying on the Supreme Court's decision. The Tribunal agreed with the AAC, citing a Kerala High Court decision, and confirmed the capital gains treatment. Assessability of gains from sale of shade trees: The ITO treated the sale proceeds of shade trees as capital gains for various assessment years, rejecting the assessee's contention that they were agricultural capital receipts. The AAC and Tribunal upheld the capital gains treatment, reducing the percentage of capital gains in later assessment years based on the average girth of trees sold. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court and High Court decisions to support the capital gains tax treatment. Conclusion: The court held that the ITO had validly reopened the assessment for 1967-68 as the information regarding the sale proceeds of shade trees came to light after the initial assessment. The gains from the sale of shade trees were deemed assessable as capital gains u/s 45 of the Income Tax Act based on relevant judicial precedents. All questions were answered in favor of the revenue, and the assessee was directed to pay costs.
|
