2019 (4) TMI 16 - AT - Central Excise

Rectification of mistake - Held that - The Tribunal has omitted to mention the Order-in-Original No.06/2011, dated 29.12.2011 in the cause title of the final order dated 23.04.2018. The error is apparent one which requires rectification. Hence the ROM application is allowed.

Summary

Issues Involved:
Rectification of error in the impugned final order regarding omission of Order-in-Original No.06/2011 in the cause title.

Analysis:
The appellant filed ROM applications seeking rectification of an error in the final order dated 23.04.2018, where the Tribunal had omitted to mention Order-in-Original No.06/2011. The counsel for the appellant highlighted that the batch of appeals were filed against two Order-in-Originals, 05/2011 and 06/2011, both dated 29.12.2011. The Authorized Representative for the Revenue agreed that the appeals were indeed against two Order-in-Originals. Upon reviewing the submissions and records, the Tribunal acknowledged the error in omitting Order-in-Original No.06/2011 in the cause title of the final order. The Tribunal found the error to be apparent and in need of rectification. Consequently, the ROM application was allowed, and the impugned order was modified to include Order-in-Original No.06/2011 in the cause title of the final order dated 23.04.2018. The Tribunal issued the order for rectification as requested by the appellant.

This judgment primarily dealt with rectifying an error in the final order where an Order-in-Original was omitted in the cause title. The Tribunal carefully considered the submissions made by both parties and reviewed the records before granting the relief sought by the appellant. The acknowledgment of the error and subsequent rectification by the Tribunal demonstrate the importance of maintaining accuracy and clarity in legal documentation. The judgment highlights the procedural aspect of correcting mistakes in orders to ensure the correctness and completeness of the legal record.