1978 (3) TMI 67 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the interest amounts charged on the debit balances in the accounts of two partners constituted taxable income of the assessee.
2. Whether the interest adjusted on the debit balances of the accounts of the partners is deductible from the share in profits of the respective partners when apportioning the total income of the firm.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Taxability of Interest Amounts Charged on Debit Balances
The court examined whether the interest amounts of Rs. 31,447, Rs. 10,833, Rs. 19,200, Rs. 30,141, and Rs. 30,343 for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1962-63, respectively, charged on the debit balances in the accounts of two partners, constituted taxable income of the assessee. The firm, constituted of two partners and later reconstituted, debited these amounts to the partners' accounts and credited them to the interest account, which then went into the profit and loss account of the firm.

The assessee contended that these amounts did not represent real income but were merely adjustments arising from the partnership agreement. However, the Income-tax Officer (ITO) and the Appellate Tribunal held that these amounts should be treated as the firm's income. The court upheld this view, stating that the interest debited to the partners and transferred to the interest account, which subsequently went into the profit and loss account, were not mere adjustment entries but real profits actually received by the firm.

The court referenced several legal precedents, including Gresham Life Assurance Society v. Styles and Pondicherry Railway Co. Ltd. v. CIT, which emphasized that profits should be understood in their natural and commercial sense. The court concluded that the amounts debited to the partners were commercial and real profits, not just book entries.

Issue 2: Deductibility of Interest Adjusted on Debit Balances
The court also addressed whether the interest adjusted on the debit balances of the partners' accounts is deductible from their share in profits when apportioning the firm's total income. The assessee argued that the interest paid by the partners should be deductible in their individual assessments. However, the court noted that the proper place for claiming such deductions was in the individual assessment of the partners, not in the firm's assessment.

The court referenced section 23(5)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and section 182 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which outline the assessment and apportionment of a firm's income among its partners. The court also cited the Supreme Court's interpretation in S. Sankappa v. ITO, which clarified that the assessment of a firm includes computing the income, determining the tax payable, and apportioning the income among the partners.

The court further noted that section 16(1)(b) of the 1922 Act specifies the mode of computing a partner's share in the firm's profits, which includes any salary, interest, commission, or other remuneration payable to the partner. However, there is no provision in the Act for deducting interest paid by a partner to the firm.

The court highlighted that section 67(3) of the 1961 Act, which allows for the deduction of interest paid by a partner on capital borrowed for investment in the firm, does not apply to interest paid to the firm. Therefore, the court concluded that the interest adjusted on the debit balances of the partners' accounts is not deductible from their share of profits.

Conclusion:
The court answered both questions in favor of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) and against the assessee. It held that the interest amounts charged on the debit balances in the accounts of the partners constituted taxable income of the assessee. Additionally, the interest adjusted on the debit balances of the partners' accounts is not deductible from their share of profits when apportioning the firm's total income. The Commissioner was awarded the costs of the reference, with a hearing fee of Rs. 150.