9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (7) TMI 671 - HC - Income TaxExemption u/s 11 denied - continued availability of registration under Section 12A(a) of the Act for the appellant as a public charitable trust - HELD THAT - In the assessee's own case for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010- 11 and 2011-12, the Tribunal, by a common order 2016 (8) TMI 1445 - ITAT CHENNAI dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee thereby denying the benefit of tax exemption computation despite recognition in the form of continued registration under Section 12A(a) of the Act. The said common order dated 03.8.2017 was challenged by the appellant assessee before this Court and by a common judgment 2019 (7) TMI 620 - MADRAS HIGH COURT , we allowed the appeals, set aside the common order passed by the Tribunal and remanded the matters to the Tribunal for a fresh consideration on all issues that may be raised by both the assessee as well as the Revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Denial of tax exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year despite registration under Section 12A(a) as a public charitable trust. 2. Misconstruction of Provisos below Section 2(15) of the Act regarding trading activities. 3. Confirmation of assessment order without examining the objects and financial statements for tax exemption on principles of mutuality. 4. Applicability of Provisos below Section 2(15) to activities aimed at protecting the environment for testing tax exemption under Section 11. Analysis: Issue 1: Denial of Tax Exemption under Section 11 The appellant challenged the denial of tax exemption under Section 11 despite having registration under Section 12A(a) as a public charitable trust. The High Court noted that in previous years, similar denials were challenged, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need for a detailed examination of the factual matrix to determine the eligibility for tax exemption under Section 11. Issue 2: Misconstruction of Provisos under Section 2(15) The appellant raised concerns about the misinterpretation of the Provisos below Section 2(15) regarding trading activities. The Court referred to Circular No.11 of 2008 issued by the CBDT, emphasizing the principle of mutuality in determining tax exemption eligibility for trade associations. Various judicial decisions were cited to highlight the importance of analyzing the objectives of the assessee to ascertain the applicability of tax exemption provisions. Issue 3: Confirmation of Assessment Order The appellant contested the confirmation of the assessment order without a thorough examination of the objects and financial statements for tax exemption based on the principles of mutuality. The Court pointed out that in previous cases, the Tribunal had analyzed the objectives of the assessee, which was lacking in the instant case. The Court stressed the necessity of examining contentions raised by the assessee and cited decisions to support the need for a comprehensive review. Issue 4: Applicability of Provisos for Environmental Activities The appellant questioned whether the Provisos below Section 2(15) would apply to activities aimed at protecting the environment for testing tax exemption under Section 11. The Court did not express a direct opinion on the matter but highlighted the importance of examining the contentions raised by the appellant and the decisions cited during the proceedings. The Court emphasized the need for a detailed reconsideration by the Tribunal to assess all issues raised by both the assessee and the Revenue. In conclusion, the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and remanded the matter for a fresh consideration of all issues raised by both parties. The Court clarified that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the contentions, leaving the substantial questions of law open for further examination.
|
