9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
1. Interpretation of income earned from shops constructed on school land under different sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Rejection of registration under section 185 of the Act for a claimed partnership firm. Interpretation of Income from Shops: The case involved an agreement where the assessee constructed shops on school land and earned income from renting them out. Initially, the Income-tax Officer assessed the income as house property income under section 22, rejecting the claim of business income under section 28. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner determined the income as from other sources but not property income. The Appellate Tribunal concluded that the income was from other sources under section 56, denying business income status. However, the High Court held that the activity constituted a business undertaking by the assessee, falling under section 28, not section 56. Registration of Partnership Firm: The assessee's claim for registration under section 185 was rejected by the authorities due to the denial of business status. The Tribunal also refused registration based on the absence of a business. However, the High Court ruled that since the activity was indeed a business, the claim for registration was valid. The court emphasized that the existence of a business is essential for partnership registration, which was satisfied in this case. The High Court's judgment clarified that the income earned from the shops constructed on school land by the assessee was assessable under section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as business income, not under section 56 as income from other sources. Additionally, the rejection of registration under section 185 was overturned as the activity was deemed a business, meeting the criteria for partnership registration.
|
