Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + Tri Companies Law - 2019 (8) TMI Tri This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (8) TMI 1001 - Tri - Companies LawConfirmation of the Scheme of Arrangement between New Kenilworth Hotel Private Limited (NKHPL) and KHR Hospitality India Limited (KHIL) and their respective Shareholders and Creditors - Sections 230 to 232 of Companies Act, 2013 - HELD THAT - From the record it appears that the convening of meetings of equity shareholders of the NKHPL and the KHIL were dispensed in as much as they had given their no-objection to the Scheme by way of Affidavits. The proposed Scheme does not seem to be contrary to the public policy, nor prejudicial to the interest of its Shareholders or detrimental to public interest at large. In addition to the above, all statutory compliance have been complied with or further undertaken for making compliance by the Petitioner Companies. Therefore, the present Company Petition deserves to be allowed. Petition allowed.
Issues: Application under Sections 230 to 232 of Companies Act, 2013 for confirmation of Scheme of Arrangement between two companies and their shareholders and creditors.
Analysis: 1. The petition sought confirmation of a Scheme of Arrangement between two companies, New Kenilworth Hotel Private Limited (NKHPL) and KHR Hospitality India Limited (KHIL), along with their shareholders and creditors. The Scheme involved transferring the Goa Undertaking from NKHPL to KHIL while retaining the Residuary Undertaking. Both companies' Board of Directors unanimously approved the Scheme, aiming to improve business focus, flexibility, and profitability. 2. The Tribunal noted that meetings of equity shareholders were dispensed with as no-objection affidavits were provided. Subsequently, meetings of secured and unsecured creditors were convened, and notices were duly sent to relevant authorities. No pending proceedings under specific sections of the Companies Act against the Petitioner Companies were reported. 3. The Petitioners demonstrated that the aggregate assets of both companies were sufficient to meet liabilities, ensuring no adverse impact on creditors' rights. Meetings of creditors were held, and reports indicated approval of the Scheme. The Regional Director's observations were considered, and the Petitioners addressed concerns raised, leading to a recommendation for Scheme approval. 4. After hearing arguments, the Tribunal found the Scheme compliant with statutory requirements and not against public policy or shareholders' interests. Consequently, the Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme, transferring assets, liabilities, and legal proceedings related to the Goa Undertaking from NKHPL to KHIL. Directions were given for filing necessary documents and granting liberty to apply for directions if needed. 5. The Company Petition and connected matters were disposed of, with provisions for filing schedules, compliance with orders, and further applications if required. Urgent certified copies of the order were to be provided to the parties upon completion of formalities.
|