1974 (3) TMI 7 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Validity of notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for reassessment in respect of assessment year 1961-62.
2. Jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer to issue the notice.
3. Reasonable belief and material for reopening the assessment.
4. Allegations regarding the genuineness of hundi loans and their impact on the assessment.
5. Requirement for the Income-tax Officer to form his own belief for initiating reassessment proceedings.

Analysis:
The High Court of Calcutta, in the case concerning a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for reassessment of the assessment year 1961-62, addressed the jurisdictional aspect of the notice. The petitioner, a partner in a firm, challenged the notice on the grounds that there was no reasonable belief or material to support the claim of income escaping assessment. The respondents argued that during subsequent assessments, it was discovered that hundi loans introduced by the assessee were not genuine. However, the court noted that the Income-tax Officer had previously accepted these loans as genuine, and a change in opinion by a different officer does not warrant reassessment without proper belief formation. The court emphasized that the Income-tax Officer must independently form a belief based on reliable information before initiating reassessment proceedings.

The court highlighted the importance of the Income-tax Officer's mental act in accepting materials and information as reliable for forming a belief under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was established that the condition precedent for exercising jurisdiction under this section had not been met in the case at hand. The court concluded that the impugned notice, along with all assessment proceedings initiated based on it, should be set aside and quashed. The ruling made the rule absolute, with no order as to costs, and stayed the operation of the order for a fortnight from the date of the judgment.