Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1976 (11) TMI HC This
Issues involved: Determination of whether certain expenditures are revenue expenses and admissible deductions u/s 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Expenditure on construction of school building: The first amount spent on constructing a school building was transferred to "Labour Welfare Account" after completion and handed over to Udamalpet Municipality for running as a school. The Income-tax Officer treated this as capital expenditure, disallowing it as a deduction. However, the High Court found that the building was not intended to be an asset of the assessee but part of a welfare scheme, exclusively used for employees' children. Therefore, it was not of a capital nature, and the expenditure should be allowed as a deduction. Advances to employees for house construction: The second item was advances made to employees for house construction, later written off to "Staff welfare account". The assessee claimed it as a business expenditure, citing a Supreme Court case. However, the High Court differentiated the present case, emphasizing that the advances were intended as loans to employees, not a business expenditure. The write-off on the last day of the accounting year did not make it a deductible expense. The Court held that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction for this amount. Conclusion: The High Court answered the question in favor of the assessee for the amount spent on the school building, allowing it as a deduction. However, for the advances made to employees for house construction, the Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing it as a deduction.
|