2019 (11) TMI 723 - SCH - Central Excise

Benefit of N/N. 108/1995-C.E., dated 28-8-1995 - compliance with the requirements of notification or not - it was held in the case that no substantial question of law arises and even otherwise the certificate ought to have been in MOP or no substantive argument for ANS has purchased the material from the present appellant. He might have been in a position to make out the case. Nothing is shown to us to establish that - HELD THAT - There is nothing to interfere with the impugned judgment - SLP dismissed.

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and did not interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. The delay was condoned, and pending applications were disposed of.