9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The issue in this case is whether the assessee-firm is entitled to registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1959-60.
Facts and Circumstances: The case involves a Hindu undivided family that carried on business under a specific name until a partial partition occurred, leading to the formation of a partnership. The partnership applied for registration, which was initially refused by the taxing authorities, leading to the reference to the High Court. Legal Analysis: The High Court previously called for an additional statement to clarify the applicability of the Advocates Act, 1961, in the case of an advocate being part of a partnership business. It was found that the Bar Councils Act, 1926, was in force at the relevant time, and it did not prohibit an advocate from having an interest in a partnership business as long as there was no active participation in the business. Court's Finding: The Appellate Tribunal's additional statement indicated that the advocate partner did not actively participate in the business, despite the partnership deed allowing for such participation. The High Court concluded that the partnership would not be rendered illegal solely based on the clause allowing the advocate to participate, as long as he did not actually engage in the business activities. Decision: The High Court held that the petitioner-firm was entitled to registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1959-60. The case was remanded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for further action, with no order as to costs.
|
