9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (4) TMI 660 - AT - Income TaxAssessment proceedings u/s.153A - Taxation of Long Term Capital Gain - investment made in purchase of new residential house as provided u/s. 54F(1)(a) - HELD THAT - Similar enhancement of addition has been deleted in original assessment proceedings, therefore, the same addition cannot be roped in the assessment proceedings u/s.153A and hence same is deleted. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues:
Challenge to taxation of Long Term Capital Gain under section 54F(1)(a) in quantum of assessment for AY 2009-10. Analysis: 1. The appeal was filed against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IV, Kanpur, enhancing Long Term Capital Gain from &8377; 30,17,456 to &8377; 64,07,515 on account of investment in a new residential house under section 54F(1)(a). 2. The original assessment was completed u/s.143(3) with two disallowances totaling &8377; 30,35,600. The CIT(A) enhanced this disallowance, which was later deleted by the ITAT in the first round of appeal against the appellate order dated 29.03.2016. 3. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had misdirected in enhancing the addition of Long Term Capital Gain, as the provisions of Section 54F were not properly considered. The CIT(A) failed to justify the enhancement and ignored the effect of Section 54F, leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal. 4. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 50C, creating a deeming fiction, should not apply to Section 54F, which is an exemption provision with its own applicability. The total taxable gain was calculated at &8377; 2,68,830 based on the actual sale consideration received, in line with Section 54F. 5. The Tribunal referred to various decisions supporting the assessee's position that the deeming fiction under Section 50C cannot be extended to Section 54F for calculating exemptions on capital gains. 6. As the similar enhancement of addition was deleted in the original assessment proceedings, the Tribunal ruled that the same addition cannot be sustained in the assessment proceedings u/s.153A and hence deleted the addition. 7. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 17th February 2020.
|
