Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (7) TMI 191 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Taxation of revenue earned from the supply of software as 'royalty.'
2. Existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India.
3. Attribution of income and arm's length price.
4. Grant of TDS credit.
5. Initiation of penalty proceedings.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxation of Revenue Earned from Supply of Software as 'Royalty':

The primary issue was whether the revenue earned from the supply of software should be taxed as 'royalty.' The assessee, engaged in various activities including hardware sales, software licensing, and professional services, had only offered receipts from professional services for taxation. The Assessing Officer, following past assessment orders, treated the revenue from software supply as 'royalty.' This issue had previously been contested up to the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, which ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that revenue from software supply is not taxable as royalty under the treaty. The Tribunal reiterated that the consideration received for supplying software along with a license to end-users is not 'royalty' under Article 12 of the Tax Treaty. The payment is for a copyrighted article and represents the purchase price of an article, hence constituting business receipts to be assessed as business income, subject to the assessee having a business connection/PE in India.

2. Existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India:

The second issue revolved around whether the assessee had a fixed PE, installation PE, or dependent agent PE in India. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision that had set aside the matter for verification. For Fixed PE, it was noted that neither party conclusively demonstrated the presence or absence of a fixed place of business in India. For Installation PE, the Tribunal found no basis for such a PE as the assessee did not carry on business through a building site or construction. Regarding Dependent Agent PE, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had not provided sufficient information to substantiate its claims, and thus, the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.

3. Attribution of Income and Arm's Length Price:

The Tribunal acknowledged the interrelation of the issues concerning the existence of a dependent agent PE, attribution of income, and transactions being at arm's length price. It directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine these issues in line with the Tribunal's directions on the dependent agent PE.

4. Grant of TDS Credit:

The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant TDS credit as per the provisions of the law.

5. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings:

The issue of initiation of penalty proceedings was deemed premature and dismissed accordingly.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine specific issues and grant TDS credit as per law. The order was pronounced in the open court on 25.06.2020.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates