9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of section 84 of the Income-tax Act regarding tax holiday eligibility for a new business entity formed through sale, reconstruction, or succession. Detailed Analysis: The judgment pertains to two references concerning the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67, involving M/s. Devson Ltd. and a new company, M/s. Kashmir Fruit and Chemical Industries Ltd. The dispute revolves around the claim of tax rebate under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, known as a tax holiday, based on whether the formation of the new company constituted a new business or a reconstruction of the existing one. The Income-tax Officer initially denied the rebate, alleging that no new company was formed, and it was a mere reconstruction of the old business by M/s. Devson Ltd. However, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal held in favor of the assessees, concluding that the new company indeed purchased the business of M/s. Kashmir Fruit and Chemical Industries, qualifying for the tax holiday under section 84. The judgment emphasizes the distinction between a sale and reconstruction of a business entity under section 84(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act. It highlights that if a new business emerges through succession or sale, the concept of reconstruction does not apply. The Tribunal affirmed that M/s. Devson Ltd. and M/s. Kashmir Fruit and Chemical Industries were separate entities, with a vendor-vendee relationship, supporting the eligibility for tax rebate. Reference to the Bombay High Court ruling in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Gaekwar Foam and Rubber Co. is made to underscore that where there is an out-and-out sale, reconstruction is ruled out. The judgment clarifies that the nature of the transaction must be scrutinized to determine if it constitutes a sale or reconstruction, with a focus on the substance rather than the form of the transaction. The judgment concludes that the new company, M/s. Kashmir Fruit and Chemical Industries, qualified as a new undertaking entitled to tax benefits under section 84(2)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. It highlights that the Tribunal's findings of fact are conclusive, and no question of law arises from the established facts, emphasizing that a reference to the court should only be made when a clear legal issue emerges. Ultimately, the court affirms the Tribunal's decision, holding that the assessees were rightfully entitled to the exemption provided under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, based on the factual findings and interpretations of the relevant legal provisions.
|
