Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (12) TMI 587 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Cancellation of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17.

Analysis:
1. The case involved cross appeals by the Revenue and the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) related to the cancellation of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2016-17.

2. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings under section 271AAB after the assessee admitted additional income of ?2,62,62,954 for FY 2015-16 & 2016-17 during a search operation. The assessee claimed the additional income was to settle with the department on an estimation basis, as no undisclosed income was found during the search. However, the Assessing Officer levied a penalty of ?52,78,600 under section 271AAB.

3. The ld. CIT(A) canceled the penalty, stating that the additional income admitted by the assessee did not qualify as 'undisclosed income' as there was no evidence of excess stock or incriminating material found during the search. The department appealed this decision.

4. During the appeal hearing, the Revenue argued that the excess purification loss claimed by the assessee, admitted during the search, fell under the definition of undisclosed income as per section 271AAB, justifying the penalty. The Revenue requested the cancellation of the CIT(A)'s order.

5. The assessee contended that the additional income admission was to avoid litigation and peace with the department, as no undisclosed assets or entries were found during the search. The assessee requested the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

6. The Tribunal found that the additional income admitted by the assessee was based on estimation and not supported by evidence of undisclosed assets or entries. As per section 271AAB, undisclosed income must be represented by money, bullion, jewelry, or entries in books found during the search, which was lacking in this case. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

7. In a separate issue, the assessee challenged the initiation of penalty proceedings for not recording the satisfaction note and specifying grounds for the show-cause notice. The Tribunal found no defects in the notice issued by the department, and the assessee did not press the grounds raised, resulting in the dismissal of the assessee's cross-appeal.

8. Consequently, both appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee were dismissed by the Tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates