Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2021 (1) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (1) TMI 976 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Approval of the Resolution Plan submitted by Shri Sai Priya Sugars Limited.
2. Compliance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code), 2016.
3. Distribution of funds to various creditors as per the Resolution Plan.
4. Evaluation of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC).
5. Rejection of the belated Expression of Interest (EOI) by Bilagi Sugar Mills Limited.
6. Implementation and supervision of the Resolution Plan.
7. Termination of the moratorium and handover of management control.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:
The application for the approval of the Resolution Plan was filed under sections 30(6) and 31 of the I&B Code, 2016 r/w Regulation 39(4) of CIRP Regulations, 2016. The Resolution Plan submitted by Shri Sai Priya Sugars Limited was approved by the CoC with 100% voting. The Tribunal, after considering all facts and circumstances, approved the Resolution Plan, declaring it binding on all stakeholders involved.

2. Compliance with the Provisions of the I&B Code:
The Resolution Professional (RP) ensured compliance with sections 13 and 15 of the I&B Code and Regulation 6 of the CIRP Regulations, 2016. The RP made a public announcement, constituted the CoC, and appointed registered valuers. The RP shared the Information Memorandum with CoC members and published Form-G for inviting EOIs. The Resolution Plan was evaluated based on the Evaluation Matrix approved by the CoC.

3. Distribution of Funds to Various Creditors:
The Resolution Plan provided for the distribution of funds as follows:
- CIRP Cost: ?0.50 Crores.
- Secured Financial Creditors: ?16.50 Crores.
- Unsecured Financial Creditors: NIL.
- Operational Creditors: NIL.
- Statutory Dues: NIL.
The distribution was based on the admitted claims and the priority order laid down in section 53 of the I&B Code.

4. Evaluation of the Resolution Plan by the CoC:
The CoC evaluated the Resolution Plan based on the Evaluation Matrix, which included parameters such as upfront cash recovery, NPV of residual loan, equity contribution, reasonableness of assumptions, track record, turnaround expertise, and financial strength. Shri Sai Priya Sugars Limited scored higher than the competing bidder, T. Rajkumar, and was approved by the CoC.

5. Rejection of the Belated EOI by Bilagi Sugar Mills Limited:
Bilagi Sugar Mills Limited submitted an EOI after the deadline, which was rejected by the RP. The CoC decided not to consider the belated EOI and proceeded with the available bids. The Tribunal dismissed the application filed by Bilagi Sugar Mills Limited seeking consideration of their EOI.

6. Implementation and Supervision of the Resolution Plan:
The Resolution Plan provided for the appointment of a Monitoring Professional to oversee its implementation. The RP was directed to hand over management control to the Resolution Applicant. The Resolution Plan included a detailed implementation schedule, sources of funding, and projected financial statements for the next five years.

7. Termination of the Moratorium and Handover of Management Control:
The moratorium imposed by the Tribunal ceased to have effect from the date of the order. The RP was directed to hand over all assets and documents to the Resolution Applicant immediately. The RP was also instructed to forward all records relating to the CIRP to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).

Conclusion:
The Tribunal approved the Resolution Plan submitted by Shri Sai Priya Sugars Limited, finding it compliant with the I&B Code and beneficial for all stakeholders. The RP was directed to facilitate the handover of management control, and the moratorium was lifted. The Resolution Applicant was given a period of one year to obtain necessary approvals required under any law for the implementation of the Resolution Plan.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates