Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2021 (6) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2021 (6) TMI 738 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Application for liquidation of corporate debtor under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Replacement of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) with Resolution Professional (RP).
3. Decision of Committee of Creditors (CoC) to initiate liquidation process due to lack of resolution plans.
4. Valuation of assets and approval for liquidation.
5. Appointment of RP as Liquidator and directions for the liquidation process.

Issue 1: Application for liquidation of corporate debtor under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

The application was filed by the Resolution Professional seeking directions for the liquidation of the corporate debtor, Ajit Automotive Service Private Limited, under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The CoC decided to replace the IRP with an RP, and after no expression of interest was received during the CIRP period, the CoC passed a resolution for liquidation under Section 33(2) of the Code.

Issue 2: Replacement of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) with Resolution Professional (RP)

Following the initial admission of the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the corporate debtor, the CoC decided to replace the IRP with Mr. Rohit Sehgal as the RP. This decision was made in accordance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Issue 3: Decision of Committee of Creditors (CoC) to initiate liquidation process due to lack of resolution plans

Despite efforts to invite Prospective Resolution Applicants through Expression of Interest rounds, no interest was received within the stipulated period. Consequently, the CoC, with the majority voting share, decided to initiate the liquidation process against the corporate debtor as a going concern. The decision was made in compliance with the relevant regulations, and the valuation reports indicated the fair value and liquidation value of the corporate debtor's assets.

Issue 4: Valuation of assets and approval for liquidation

Valuation reports obtained from registered valuers revealed the fair value and liquidation value of the corporate debtor's assets. The CoC, after due deliberation and in the absence of a resolution plan during the CIRP period, opted for liquidation as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The decision to liquidate the corporate debtor was deemed appropriate by the Tribunal, and the RP was appointed as the Liquidator to oversee the process.

Issue 5: Appointment of RP as Liquidator and directions for the liquidation process

The Tribunal ordered the corporate debtor, Ajit Automotive Service Private Limited, to be liquidated, and the RP was appointed as the Liquidator. Various directions were issued, including the issuance of a Public Announcement, communication with regulatory authorities, submission of reports, and initiation of the liquidation process in accordance with the relevant regulations. The order also addressed the cessation of the Moratorium under Section 14 of the Code and provided for necessary intimation to stakeholders.

In conclusion, the Tribunal approved the application for liquidation and provided detailed directions for the commencement and management of the liquidation process in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and relevant regulations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates