Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2022 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (1) TMI 358 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Classification of goods under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 for the period 1.6.2013 to 30.4.2016.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification Dispute:
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing Animal or Vegetable Fertilizers under chapter 31 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, cleared the product "Biozyme" claiming nil rate of duty under sub-heading 31010099. The Revenue disputed this classification, arguing that "Biozyme" should be classified under tariff entry 31051000. The dispute arose due to the interpretation of goods in tablet or liquid form under different tariff headings.

2. Appellant's Argument:
The appellant contended that heading 3105 excludes goods in liquid form and applies only to goods in tablet form or packages not exceeding 10 kg. They relied on the principle of noscitur a sociis to interpret the relevant chapter headings. Additionally, they cited precedents to support their interpretation of the classification.

3. Revenue's Argument:
The Revenue argued that changes in the Tariff Act post-2005 expanded the scope of heading 3105 to include goods in tablet or liquid form in packages not exceeding 10 kg. They emphasized the specific description provided in the tariff entry and the changes in the wording of the relevant chapters after the amendment.

4. Judgment on Classification:
The Tribunal analyzed the definitions of kilogram and kilolitre to determine the form of goods covered under different tariff headings. They applied the principle of noscitur a sociis to interpret the chapter headings and concluded that "Biozyme" in liquid form should be classified under sub-heading 31010099, not 31051000. The Tribunal also referred to the Legal Metrology Rules to support their classification decision based on the unit of volume in which the goods were sold.

5. Decision and Relief:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. The classification of "Biozyme" under chapter 31051000 was deemed incorrect, and the product was held to be correctly classifiable under chapter 31010099 of the Tariff Act. The appellant was granted consequential relief as per the judgment.

In conclusion, the judgment resolved the classification dispute by interpreting the relevant tariff entries, applying legal principles, and considering precedents to determine the appropriate classification of the product "Biozyme" under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates