Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2022 (1) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (1) TMI 1056 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Utilization of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for payment of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on outward supply.
2. Nexus requirement between inputs and outputs for ITC utilization.
3. Applicability of Section 16 and Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017.
4. Interpretation of Rule 86 of CGST Rules regarding ITC utilization.
5. Time limit for filing the appeal.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Utilization of ITC for Payment of GST on Outward Supply:
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing and trading Gold & Silver Bullion and Castor Oil Seeds, sought to utilize ITC earned on inputs like Gold & Silver Dore bars for paying GST on the outward supply of Castor Oil Seeds. The GAAR ruled against this, stating that ITC earned on inputs meant for Bullion cannot be used for Castor Oil Seeds due to lack of nexus.

2. Nexus Requirement Between Inputs and Outputs for ITC Utilization:
GAAR emphasized the need for a direct connection between inputs and outputs for ITC utilization, as per Section 16(1) of the CGST Act. The ruling stated that the appellant failed to prove the nexus between Gold & Silver Dore bars and Castor Oil Seeds. However, the Appellate Authority disagreed, stating that once ITC is validly taken, it merges into a common pool and does not require a commodity-wise nexus for utilization.

3. Applicability of Section 16 and Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017:
Section 16(1) allows ITC for inputs used in the course or furtherance of business. Section 17(5) lists exclusions for ITC. GAAR acknowledged that Gold & Silver Dore bars are not excluded under Section 17(5) but insisted on proving the nexus under Section 16(1). The Appellate Authority clarified that Section 16(1) does not mandate one-to-one correlation between inputs and specific outward supplies and that ITC can be used for any taxable or zero-rated outward supply.

4. Interpretation of Rule 86 of CGST Rules Regarding ITC Utilization:
The appellant argued that Rule 86 does not restrict ITC utilization for specific outputs and that ITC in the Electronic Credit Ledger can be used for any output tax liability. The Appellate Authority agreed, stating that the common pool of ITC can be used for any taxable supply, and there is no requirement to demonstrate a nexus between specific inputs and outputs.

5. Time Limit for Filing the Appeal:
The appeal was filed within the prescribed 30-day limit from the date of communication of the GAAR ruling. The Appellate Authority confirmed the appeal was timely, considering the extensions provided by the Supreme Court due to COVID-19.

Findings:
The Appellate Authority found that ITC validly taken on inputs merges into a common pool in the Electronic Credit Ledger. ITC can be utilized for any output tax liability, and there is no requirement to prove a nexus between specific inputs and outputs. The ruling of GAAR was set aside, and it was held that the appellant can use ITC earned on Gold & Silver Dore bars for paying GST on Castor Oil Seeds.

Conclusion:
The appeal was allowed, modifying the GAAR ruling. The appellant can use the ITC balance for payment of GST on Castor Oil Seeds, and ITC utilization cannot be denied based on the lack of nexus between inputs and outputs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates