Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2022 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (7) TMI 350 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues:
Rate of tax on sale of iron window and frames

Analysis:
The revisionist filed a revision against the order of the Commercial Tax Tribunal, Agra, regarding the rate of tax on the sale of iron window and frames. The Tribunal had dismissed the appeal on the issue of tax rate, subjecting the commodities to tax at 10% as an unclassified commodity. The question of law raised was whether the Tribunal was legally justified in determining the tax rate at 10% on the enhanced turnover of windows grill etc. The assessing officer did not discuss the tax rate on the turnover of self-manufactured frames and grills, estimating it at Rs. 5,00,000. The assessee did not raise specific grounds on the tax rate before the appeal authority, but raised it during the oral hearing before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal allowed the ground to be raised as a pure legal ground but later rejected it. The Tribunal reasoned that iron frames and grills could not be covered by the notification entry for millstores, citing earlier decisions. However, the High Court observed that the language of the law or taxing entry may apply only if it remains the same. For the relevant assessment year, the taxing entry had been amended by a notification, including iron and steel goods not covered by any other item of the schedule or notification. The Court interpreted the notification to include all iron and steel goods, regardless of specific names or descriptions.

The Court emphasized that the legislature's intent was clear in including iron and steel goods under the notification, except for iron or steel wires explicitly excluded. Since there was no other specific taxing entry that described the goods more appropriately, the generic entry of all iron and steel goods applied. The Court distinguished the earlier decisions cited by the Tribunal, stating they were in different factual and legislative contexts. Ultimately, the Court allowed the revision, answering the question of law in favor of the assessee and against the revenue, with no costs imposed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates