Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2022 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (10) TMI 675 - HC - GST


Issues Involved:
Challenge to cancellation of GST registration due to time-barred appeal.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a registered dealer under the GST Act, had their registration cancelled by the competent authority. The petitioner filed an e-appeal after the prescribed period but failed to submit the hard copy within the limitation period. The appeal was dismissed as time-barred, leading to the petitioner challenging the dismissal order. The petitioner's counsel relied on judgments from various High Courts to argue that the petitioner should not be left remediless due to a hyper-technical reason. It was contended that the cancellation of GST registration deprived the petitioner of their livelihood, violating the right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The respondent vehemently opposed the petitioner's submissions but acknowledged that the legal propositions from the cited judgments addressed the current controversy. It was recognized that the petitioner's inability to continue business without GST registration would indeed violate their right to life and liberty. Consequently, the order dismissing the appeal as time-barred was set aside. The petitioner was granted the liberty to file an appeal against the cancellation of GST registration within ten days. The competent authority was directed to consider and decide the appeal in accordance with the law, excluding the limitation period for filing the appeal.

In conclusion, the High Court allowed the petitioner another opportunity to file the appeal against the cancellation of GST registration, emphasizing the importance of not depriving individuals of their livelihood due to technicalities. The judgment aimed to uphold the right to life and liberty as guaranteed by the Constitution of India, ensuring that the petitioner's case would be considered without the limitation bar.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates