Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2023 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (5) TMI 844 - HC - Income Tax


Issues involved:
The judgment involves appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeals concern additions made to the taxable income of the appellant for the assessment years 1994-95 and 1995-96, based on a search and seizure operation at the premises of the appellant.

For A.Y. 1994-95:
The appellant challenged the addition of Rs.8,36,936/- in its income, arguing that the amount included purchases made by its sister concern. However, the appellant failed to provide evidence to support this claim, leading the Tribunal to calculate the undisclosed income at Rs.3,50,000/-. The Court upheld this decision, citing Section 69-C of the Act to deem the amount as the appellant's income.

The appellant also contested the addition of Rs.4,64,536/- for unrecorded rolling charges. Despite partial relief granted by the CIT (A), the Tribunal reinstated the full amount as the appellant failed to prove incurring expenses, resulting in no interference by the Court.

For A.Y. 1995-96:
The appellant disputed the addition of Rs.5,76,726/- for rolling charges received outside the books of account. The Tribunal restored 75% of the addition, as the appellant could not demonstrate the expenses were recorded, leading the Court to affirm the Tribunal's decision.

Additionally, the appellant challenged the gross profit calculation on sales shown in a seized document. The assessing officer assessed gross profit at 8%, reduced to 2% by the CIT (A), and then reinstated to 8% by the Tribunal. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, stating the gross profit calculation at 8% was reasonable, with no valid reason for further reduction.

In conclusion, the Court found no merit in the appeals and dismissed them, along with any miscellaneous applications.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates