Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2023 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (6) TMI 528 - AAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Qualification of Project Development Service and Project Management Consultancy services under Article 243G and 243W of the Constitution of India.
2. Eligibility for GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) for Pure Services provided to government entities.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Qualification under Article 243G and 243W

The applicant sought a ruling on whether the Project Development Service (Detailed Project Report Service, 'DPR') and Project Management Consultancy services ('PMCS') provided to the State Urban Development Agency (SUDA) under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban (PMAY-U) qualify as activities related to functions entrusted to Panchayats or Municipalities under Article 243G or 243W of the Constitution of India.

The judgment established that SUDA is a state-level nodal agency under the Department for Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation by the Uttar Pradesh Government. SUDA's main objectives include identifying urban poor, formulating and implementing schemes for their upliftment, and reviewing the progress and effectiveness of these activities. SUDA's activities align with the functions listed in the 11th and 12th schedules of the Constitution, which pertain to Panchayats and Municipalities, respectively. Therefore, the services rendered by the applicant under the contract with SUDA for PMAY-U are in relation to functions entrusted to Municipalities under Article 243W and to Panchayats under Article 243G of the Constitution.

Issue 2: Eligibility for GST Exemption

The second issue was whether such services qualify as Pure Services (excluding works contract service or composite supplies involving supply of any goods) provided to government entities, thus eligible for GST exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

The judgment detailed the scope of work under the agreements, which included physical verification, data collection, preparation of architectural designs, project structuring, and supervision of construction activities. These services were deemed to qualify as Pure Services, as they did not involve works contract services or the supply of goods. The notification exempts Pure Services provided to the Central Government, State Government, Union territory, or local authority by way of any activity related to functions entrusted to Panchayats or Municipalities under Articles 243G and 243W.

The ruling also referenced similar cases and orders, including those from the Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling and the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra, which supported the view that services provided by a subcontractor to a main contractor for government projects are eligible for GST exemption if the services align with the specified functions and conditions.

Conclusion:

1. The services provided by the applicant under the contract with SUDA for PMAY-U qualify as activities related to functions entrusted to Panchayats and Municipalities under Articles 243G and 243W of the Constitution.
2. These services qualify as Pure Services and are exempt from GST under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended, and corresponding notifications under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates