Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AAR Customs - 2023 (6) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (6) TMI 653 - AAR - Customs


Issues Involved:

1. Classification of "Roasted Areca Nuts" under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
2. Applicability of Chapter 8 vs. Chapter 20 for roasted areca nuts.
3. Interpretation of relevant legal provisions and case laws.

Summary:

Issue 1: Classification of "Roasted Areca Nuts" under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

The applicant sought an advance ruling on the classification of "Roasted Areca Nuts" for imports from Indonesia through various Indian ports. The applicant argued that the product should be classified under Chapter 20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, specifically under CTH 2008 19 20, as roasted nuts. The applicant detailed the process of roasting, which involves de-husking, drying, and repeated roasting at high temperatures, resulting in significant changes to the physical and chemical properties of the nuts.

Issue 2: Applicability of Chapter 8 vs. Chapter 20 for roasted areca nuts.

The jurisdictional Customs Commissionerates argued that the product should be classified under Chapter 8, specifically under CTH 0802 80, as the processes described fall under "moderate heat treatment" mentioned in Chapter Note 3 of Chapter 8. They contended that the process of roasting does not fundamentally alter the essential character of the betel nut, and thus it should remain classified under Chapter 8.

However, the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) found that the process of roasting, as described by the applicant, involves severe heat treatment, which is distinct from the moderate heat treatment mentioned in Chapter 8. The AAR noted that roasting results in significant changes in the physical and chemical characteristics of the nuts, making them fit for immediate consumption without any additional ingredients.

Issue 3: Interpretation of relevant legal provisions and case laws.

The AAR referred to the General Rules of Interpretation (GIR) and relevant Supreme Court judgments, including Amrit Agro Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise vs. Phil Corporation Ltd., which upheld the classification of roasted nuts under Chapter 20. The AAR emphasized the importance of HSN Explanatory Notes, which specifically mention dry-roasted, oil-roasted, and fat-roasted nuts under CTH 2008.

The AAR concluded that the process of roasting constitutes a "preparation" and that roasted areca nuts should be classified under Chapter 20, specifically under CTH 2008 19 20. The ruling highlighted that the process of roasting is not covered by Note 3 to Chapter 8 and that the roasted nuts find specific mention in Chapter 20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Ruling:

The AAR ruled that the roasted betel nuts fall under Tariff heading 2008, specifically under Tariff entry 2008 19 20: "Other roasted nuts & seeds" of Chapter 20 of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates