Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + SCH Income Tax - 2023 (8) TMI SCH This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (8) TMI 689 - SCH - Income Tax


Issues:
The judgment deals with the applicability of tax exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act to entities engaged in charitable activities falling under Section 10(29) of the Act.

Summary:
The Supreme Court, in a judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B. V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, considered the appeal concerning tax exemption for an entity conducting charitable activities under Section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant-Revenue and the respondent jointly referred to a previous judgment of the Court in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, highlighting that the present appeals are covered by the said decision. The Court noted that entities engaged in public utility services, like the respondent, may be entitled to tax exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act.

In its analysis, the Court referred to the nature of activities carried out by entities such as the respondent and cited the observations made in the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority case. The Court emphasized that amounts charged by statutory bodies for public functions/services are generally excluded from commercial activities due to their essential public purposes. However, assessing authorities must assess whether the charges significantly exceed costs and nominal markups, which would then indicate commercial activities subject to tax limits. The Court clarified the interpretation of terms like "commercial" in the context of tax exemptions and highlighted the need for case-by-case decisions by the Central Government for bodies notified under Section 10(46) of the Act.

Ultimately, the Court found that the principles discussed were directly applicable to the respondent-Corporation in question and dismissed the appeals, with any pending applications being disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates