Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2023 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (9) TMI 340 - HC - GST


Issues involved:
The first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 33/2023, registered at Police Station- Basantpur, District Balrampur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of I.P.C.

Details of the Judgment:

Prosecution's Case:
The prosecution alleged that a truck carrying cement was intercepted, and discrepancies were found in the delivery destination compared to the documents. This led to the registration of Crime No. 33/2023 against the applicant for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of I.P.C.

Applicant's Defense:
The applicant, represented by counsel, argued that he was falsely implicated, had not evaded tax payment, and had proper documentation for the goods being transported. It was stated that the applicant had the authority to sell the cement and had raised invoices accordingly.

Arguments by Both Sides:
The applicant's counsel contended that the applicant had not committed the alleged offences and should be granted anticipatory bail. In contrast, the State's counsel opposed the bail application, citing clear allegations against the applicant.

Assistant Commissioner's Report:
An Assistant Commissioner of GST provided a report stating that although tax invoices were present, the transportation was deemed illegal due to discrepancies. Physical verification confirmed the presence of 700 cement bags.

Court's Decision:
After reviewing the case diary and material on record, the court found no evidence of the applicant preparing forged documents related to GST or other invoices. It was noted that the prosecution had not collected sufficient evidence to establish the commission of the alleged offences. The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. to the applicant.

Bail Conditions:
The court allowed the anticipatory bail application and directed the applicant to be released on anticipatory bail upon arrest, upon executing a personal bond and surety. The applicant was also required to make themselves available for interrogation, refrain from influencing witnesses, and attend all trial court dates.

Conclusion:
The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant considering the lack of evidence supporting the alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. The bail conditions were set to ensure compliance with the legal procedures.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates