Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + HC Service Tax - 2023 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (10) TMI 505 - HC - Service Tax


Issues:
The judgment involves the challenge to an order declaring the petitioner ineligible under Section 125 (1) (e) of the Finance (No. 2), 2019 to file a declaration under the Sabka Vishvas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and a prayer for the acceptance of the petitioner's declaration.

Details:
The petitioner faced financial difficulties in 2017 and was notified by the tax authorities for non-payment and non-filing of service tax returns. The petitioner responded by submitting replies and making multiple deposits towards the pending tax liability. Despite making substantial payments, the tax authorities continued to demand further amounts, including interest and penalties. Ultimately, the petitioner cleared the entire service tax liability with interest and penalty by April 2019.

Details:
A letter dated 16.03.2023 highlighted the sequence of deposits made by the petitioner in response to the tax authorities' demands. The petitioner deposited varying amounts at different intervals, totaling to Rs. 75 lacs, and eventually cleared the entire service tax liability by April 2019. The tax authorities, however, claimed that the petitioner had short-paid interest for the period, leading to further demands for payment.

Details:
The petitioner argued that as the duty amount was quantified before 30.06.2019, they were eligible to file a declaration under the Sabka Vishvas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Referring to a circular, the petitioner contended that the duty demand being quantified before the specified date made them eligible for the scheme. The court agreed with this interpretation and set aside the order declaring the petitioner ineligible, remanding the matter back to reconsider the petitioner's eligibility under the scheme based on the quantified duty amount before the deadline.

This judgment emphasizes the importance of timely quantification of duty amounts for eligibility under tax amnesty schemes and highlights the significance of clear communication between taxpayers and tax authorities in resolving disputes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates