Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2022 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (7) TMI 1575 - AT - Central Excise


The Appellate Tribunal in this case considered the issue of eligibility for Cenvat credit on various items used for repair, maintenance, and fabrication in a manufacturing unit. The core legal questions addressed in the judgment were whether certain items such as M.S. plates, beams, angles, steel castings, asbestos sheets, nitrogen gas, PVC sheets, and aluminium conductors are eligible for Cenvat credit as inputs or capital goods. The Tribunal also examined whether the items used for erecting supporting structures qualify for Cenvat credit.The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision where it had ruled on similar issues and provided guidance on the eligibility of certain items for Cenvat credit. In the present case, the Commissioner (Appeals) had allowed Cenvat credit for certain items while disallowing credit for others based on the previous Tribunal ruling. The appellant argued that the items in question were used in the factory for production, repair, and maintenance of plant and machinery, thus qualifying for Cenvat credit.The Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both parties and reviewed relevant legal precedents. It noted that a Larger Bench ruling had overruled the previous Tribunal decision, providing clarity on the eligibility of certain items for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal cited the case of Mangalam Cement Ltd., where it was held that items like cement and steel used for foundation and machinery installation could be considered as inputs for Cenvat credit.Based on the interpretation of the definition of "input" and relevant precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the items in question, including iron and steel structures, steel castings, and aluminium conductors, were eligible for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal relied on the rulings of the Chattisgarh High Court and the Larger Bench decision in Mangalam Cement Ltd. to support its decision.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and held that the appellants were entitled to Cenvat credit on the specified items. The appellants were granted consequential benefits in accordance with the law. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the use of items in relation to manufacturing processes when determining eligibility for Cenvat credit.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates