2002 (12) TMI 102 - HC - Central Excise

Summary

Issues Involved:

1. Validity of the CEGAT order dated 18th May 2002.
2. Tribunal's deviation from its earlier binding decisions.
3. Applicability of Notification No. 1/93 and its benefits.

Summary:

Validity of the CEGAT order dated 18th May 2002:
The petitioner challenged the validity of the CEGAT order dated 18th May 2002, arguing it was unjust, improper, and illegal. The Tribunal ignored its previous views in Watts Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Kochi and Shree Cables & Conductors Ltd. v. Commissioner, which were confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The respondent's counsel reluctantly agreed that the impugned order could not be justified.

Tribunal's deviation from its earlier binding decisions:
The Tribunal erred in taking a different view from its earlier decisions in Watts Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and Shree Cables & Conductors Ltd. The Tribunal should not have changed its view without assigning any reason or referring to its earlier decisions. The Tribunal's decision was inconsistent with its previous rulings and the Supreme Court's confirmation.

Applicability of Notification No. 1/93 and its benefits:
The petitioners, small-scale manufacturers of Polyester Texturised Yarns, were initially unaware of the amendments allowing them to avail benefits under Notification No. 1/93 from 20th May 1994. The Superintendent of Central Excise issued a show cause notice demanding differential duty, which was confirmed by the Assistant Commissioner. The Commissioner of Appeals allowed the petitioners' appeal, but the Tribunal later set aside this order. The Tribunal's decision was challenged for not following its earlier binding decisions and for being arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment:
The High Court quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 18th May 2002, passed by the CEGAT, and declared that the benefit of Notification No. 1/93 was available to the manufacturer only from 20th May 1994. The petitioners were entitled to the benefit by computing the value of clearance from the date they opted for the exemption in 1994-95. The Special Civil Application was allowed to that extent, with no order as to costs. The second point regarding Article 14 of the Constitution of India was not decided.