2000 (5) TMI 57 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues involved:
The issues involved in this judgment include the classification of goods for duty payment, provisional assessment of duty, misdeclaration in price lists, imposition of penalty under Section 11AC, and compliance with Central Excise Rules.

Classification of Goods and Provisional Assessment:
The appellants, as manufacturers of goods falling under Chapter 72, faced a demand for additional duty on sales from their depots. The Tribunal considered whether the assessments were provisional as per Rule 9B, emphasizing the need for proper procedure and material on record to establish provisional assessments.

Misdeclaration in Price Lists:
The appellants contested the Commissioner's findings regarding misdeclaration in price lists, arguing that they had paid duty according to legal precedents and that expenses incurred at depots should not be included in assessable value. They also disputed allegations of misstatement and suppression, citing evidence produced before the Range Superintendent.

Imposition of Penalty:
The appellants challenged the imposition of 100% penalty under Section 11AC and Rs. 18 lakhs under Rules 173Q, arguing that contravention of Central Excise Rules was not proven. They also raised concerns about the retrospective application of Section 11AC and pleaded against double jeopardy.

Compliance with Central Excise Rules:
The Tribunal analyzed various rules, including Rule 9B and Rules 173B(2A), 173C(5), and 173CC, related to provisional assessment and clearance of goods. It highlighted the mandatory nature of orders for provisional assessment and the importance of following prescribed procedures for duty demands or refunds.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal held that the Supreme Court's decision in Samrat International applies not only to cases of refund but also to cases of demand, emphasizing the need for compliance with Rule 9B to establish provisional assessments. The matter was referred back to the Bench for further consideration on remaining grounds of appeal, including the provisional nature of assessments based on the Assistant Commissioner's order.