Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + SC Income Tax - 1968 (9) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1968 (9) TMI 14 - SC - Income Tax


  1. 1993 (11) TMI 1 - SC
  2. 1986 (7) TMI 6 - SC
  3. 1970 (4) TMI 28 - SCH
  4. 2024 (1) TMI 761 - HC
  5. 2019 (4) TMI 1039 - HC
  6. 2017 (7) TMI 736 - HC
  7. 2015 (5) TMI 551 - HC
  8. 2015 (3) TMI 720 - HC
  9. 2014 (4) TMI 682 - HC
  10. 2014 (4) TMI 972 - HC
  11. 2010 (10) TMI 100 - HC
  12. 2007 (8) TMI 790 - HC
  13. 2006 (4) TMI 113 - HC
  14. 1992 (1) TMI 68 - HC
  15. 1985 (3) TMI 39 - HC
  16. 1983 (12) TMI 4 - HC
  17. 1981 (12) TMI 21 - HC
  18. 1980 (8) TMI 14 - HC
  19. 1979 (9) TMI 24 - HC
  20. 2024 (11) TMI 1024 - AT
  21. 2021 (8) TMI 773 - AT
  22. 2019 (9) TMI 660 - AT
  23. 2019 (5) TMI 1554 - AT
  24. 2018 (2) TMI 181 - AT
  25. 2017 (9) TMI 1152 - AT
  26. 2017 (3) TMI 1717 - AT
  27. 2017 (7) TMI 659 - AT
  28. 2016 (11) TMI 590 - AT
  29. 2016 (8) TMI 997 - AT
  30. 2015 (12) TMI 1525 - AT
  31. 2015 (6) TMI 605 - AT
  32. 2015 (5) TMI 355 - AT
  33. 2015 (4) TMI 756 - AT
  34. 2015 (1) TMI 1338 - AT
  35. 2014 (8) TMI 112 - AT
  36. 2014 (6) TMI 329 - AT
  37. 2014 (5) TMI 936 - AT
  38. 2015 (10) TMI 1062 - AT
  39. 2014 (1) TMI 1534 - AT
  40. 2014 (1) TMI 708 - AT
  41. 2014 (1) TMI 846 - AT
  42. 2013 (3) TMI 742 - AT
  43. 2013 (10) TMI 761 - AT
  44. 2012 (12) TMI 841 - AT
  45. 2012 (12) TMI 567 - AT
  46. 2012 (12) TMI 599 - AT
  47. 2012 (10) TMI 90 - AT
  48. 2012 (9) TMI 685 - AT
  49. 2012 (8) TMI 396 - AT
  50. 2012 (5) TMI 393 - AT
  51. 2012 (4) TMI 270 - AT
  52. 2012 (4) TMI 266 - AT
  53. 2013 (6) TMI 515 - AT
  54. 2012 (3) TMI 76 - AT
  55. 2011 (11) TMI 253 - AT
  56. 2011 (3) TMI 1659 - AT
  57. 2010 (10) TMI 784 - AT
  58. 2010 (6) TMI 510 - AT
  59. 2010 (3) TMI 1129 - AT
  60. 2009 (2) TMI 233 - AT
  61. 2006 (9) TMI 205 - AT
  62. 2006 (4) TMI 440 - AT
  63. 2006 (3) TMI 556 - AT
  64. 2005 (9) TMI 232 - AT
  65. 2005 (9) TMI 230 - AT
  66. 2003 (12) TMI 281 - AT
  67. 2003 (3) TMI 294 - AT
  68. 1998 (10) TMI 90 - AT
  69. 1995 (6) TMI 47 - AT
  70. 1992 (9) TMI 127 - AT
Issues:
1. Taxability of sale proceeds of bonus shares received by the assessees as part of their stock-in-trade.
2. Interpretation of bonus shares as capital or income for the purpose of taxation.
3. Examination of the Tribunal's findings and its reliance on evidence in determining tax liability.

Analysis:
The case involved the tax treatment of sale proceeds from bonus shares received by the assessees, who dealt in shares and securities. The Income-tax Officer assessed the proceeds as income arising from the share dealing business. The Tribunal referred the question of law to the High Court to determine if the sale proceeds of bonus shares should be included in the assessees' total income as profits of the share dealing business. The High Court, with a Full Bench majority, answered the question in the negative, leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court analyzed the nature of bonus shares issued by companies, emphasizing that under the Income-tax Act, 1922, bonus shares from capitalization of accumulated profits were not considered as dividend. Citing precedents like Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. John Blott and Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mercantile Bank of India, the Court established that bonus shares, absent contrary provisions, are to be treated as capital and not income for shareholders.

The Court disagreed with the Tribunal's conclusion that the sale proceeds of bonus shares were part of the assessees' profit from the share dealing business. It noted that bonus shares, although accretions to the stock-in-trade, do not ipso facto become part of the business's stock-in-trade. The assessees received the bonus shares as capital, which could be converted into stock-in-trade or retained as a capital asset. The lack of evidence supporting the Tribunal's finding that the bonus shares were incorporated into the stock-in-trade weakened its position.

Moreover, the Court highlighted that the High Court must accept the findings of fact made by the Tribunal in an Income-tax Act reference unless challenged appropriately. Since the assessees failed to challenge the Tribunal's findings on evidence validity, they could not dispute the findings before the High Court. Consequently, the Court discharged the High Court's answer and held that the sale proceeds of the bonus shares were not taxable as income but as capital. The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates