Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (3) TMI 198 - AT - Central ExciseSSI Exemption - Value of clearances - Clubbing of - Demand - Limitation - Extended period - Modvat/Cenvat
Issues:
Three appeals arising from a Common Adjudication Order dated 11-3-91 passed by Collector, Central Excise. Analysis: 1. Facts and Allegations: - Appellants M/s. Meta Craft and Meta Pack manufacture metal containers. - Central Excise Officers found discrepancies in stock and financial transactions between the units. - Collector confirmed excise duty demand, imposed penalties, and ordered confiscation based on findings of commonality and financial assistance. 2. Defence by Appellants: - Appellants argued separate registrations, job work payments, and absence of common partners negate the need to lift the corporate veil. - Cited precedents emphasizing factors like common facilities not conclusive for clubbing clearances. 3. Time Bar and Duty Calculation: - Appellants claimed time-barred demand due to approved classification lists and granted benefits. - Disputed duty calculation, citing inflated amounts and correct payments made. 4. Department's Stand: - Emphasized suppression of full manufacturing details justifying extended limitation period. - Relied on precedents for clubbing clearances based on common control and financial relationships. 5. Judicial Analysis: - Found common control, financial interdependence, and shared resources indicating clubbing of clearances justified. - Upheld duty demands, confiscations, and penalties based on established financial connections and common operational control. - Reduced redemption fine and adjusted penalties considering the roles and responsibilities of the involved parties. 6. Conclusion: - Upheld clubbing of clearances, duty demands, and confiscations based on established relationships and operational control. - Adjusted penalties and fines considering individual roles and mitigating factors. - Disposed of all three appeals with modified penalties and upheld duty demands and confiscations based on established financial connections and shared operational control.
|