9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Misdeclaration of export price, DEPB benefit calculation, Confiscation of goods, Penalty under Customs Act
Misdeclaration of export price: The appellant exported coffee mugs and declared an FOB value of US $ 3.40 per piece. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs alleged misdeclaration, stating the export price cannot be significantly higher than the purchase price of Rs. 35 per piece. The authorities fixed the FOB value at Rs. 80 per piece, leading to confiscation of goods and imposition of a penalty. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision. The appellant argued that the declared export price was genuine and supported by the purchase price. The Tribunal found no evidence of misdeclaration and deemed the lower authorities' FOB price determination as arbitrary and lacking legal basis. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing DEPB credit based on the declared FOB value. DEPB benefit calculation: The DEPB credit was claimed based on the FOB value declared by the appellant. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the lower authorities' decision to calculate the credit as a percentage of the computed FOB value of Rs. 80 per piece. However, the Tribunal found this calculation arbitrary and unsupported by the DEPB scheme's guidelines. The Tribunal emphasized that DEPB benefits are fixed by authorities at specific percentages of FOB value for products covered by the scheme. The appellant's argument that DEPB credit should be based on the declared FOB value of US $ 3.40 was accepted by the Tribunal, leading to the allowance of the appeal. Confiscation of goods and Penalty under Customs Act: The order of adjudication confiscated goods and imposed a penalty under Section 114 of the Customs Act due to the alleged misdeclaration of FOB value. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision. However, the Tribunal found no evidence supporting the misdeclaration and deemed the confiscation and penalty unjustified. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant in terms of DEPB credit and overturning the penalties imposed.
|
