9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Valuation of processed fabrics for Central Excise duty - Addition of costs to assessable value - Manufacturing profit - Octroi, transportation charges, shrinkages
In this case, the appellants were engaged in processing fabrics under Chapters 52, 54, and 55 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, receiving grey fabrics from traders for job work. The appellants filed price lists following the law established by the Apex Court in Ujagar Prints v. UOI. After approval of price lists, the department proposed an addition of 10% to the assessable value without issuing a show cause notice. The matter was directed back to the original authority for a speaking order. Subsequently, show cause notices were issued alleging non-disclosure of manufacturing costs and profits in the assessable value calculation. The Asstt. Commissioner added various percentages towards octroi, transportation, shrinkages, and manufacturing profits. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this addition, leading to the current appeal. The main issue for consideration was whether further additions beyond the declared assessable value were justified. The appellants contended that the job charges already covered manufacturing profits, citing precedents like CC, Bombay v. Crown Tobacco Company. The Tribunal agreed, holding that manufacturing profit need not be separately added. Regarding octroi, transportation, and other costs, the Tribunal found these were already included in the cost of raw material, and no separate addition was warranted. The bills received by the appellants for grey fabrics indicated their value, which was used to compute the assessable value, making additional costs unnecessary. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision clarified that manufacturing profit need not be separately added to the assessable value of processed fabrics, as job charges already covered this aspect. Additionally, costs like octroi, transportation, and shrinkages were deemed included in the raw material cost, eliminating the need for further additions. The Tribunal's ruling provided clarity on the valuation process for Central Excise duty, ensuring consistency with established legal principles and precedents.
|
