9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Penalty imposition under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on importer firm for misdeclaration of goods; Reduction of total demand and penalty by Bangalore Bench; Role of indenting firm and manager in misdeclaration; Excessive penalty imposition and its reduction.
In this case, the Commissioner imposed a penalty of Rs. 5.00 lakhs each on the Proprietor of the indenting firm and the Manager under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 for misdeclaration of goods cleared by the importer firm. The goods declared as leather chemicals were found to be misdeclared, leading to duty exemption ineligibility for the importer firm. The Bangalore Bench later reduced the total demand and penalty on the importer firm to Rs. 1,48,142/-, considering the appeals by the importer. The Tribunal, after scrutinizing the documents of the indenting firm and the confession of ineligible benefit availed through misdeclaration, upheld the Commissioner's finding that the Proprietor and Manager were responsible for importing the goods by misdeclaring them as Syncurol SLE. The modus operandi of misdeclaration was clearly outlined in the order, and no grounds were found to set aside the Commissioner's findings. Regarding the penalty imposed, the Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty of Rs. 5.00 lakhs each on the appellants was excessive. Considering the reduction in total duty demands and penalty for the importer firm, the Tribunal decided to reduce the penalty on the two appellants to Rs. 1.50 lakhs each. The appeals were disposed of by confirming the impugned order, focusing solely on the reduction of the penalty amount imposed on the indentor and its manager.
|
