1993 (11) TMI 2 - SC - Income Tax

Deduction From Long Term Capital Gains - held that before allowing relief u/s 80T, Long term capital loss brought forward from earlier years should be set off first

Summary

Issues Involved:

1. Interpretation of Section 80T of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Determination of whether Section 80T relief should be given before or after setting off capital losses from previous years.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Interpretation of Section 80T of the Income-tax Act, 1961

The primary issue in this case was the interpretation of Section 80T of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the words "such income" in Section 80T referred to the capital gains received in the relevant accounting year, without setting off the capital loss brought forward from earlier years. The Income-tax Officer, however, took into account the figure arrived at after setting off the capital loss of previous assessment years against the capital gains for the assessment year 1970-71. The High Court of Kerala affirmed this view, stating that the relief under Section 80T should be given only for the amount of capital gains after the capital loss is set off.

Determination of whether Section 80T relief should be given before or after setting off capital losses from previous years

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, agreeing that the gross total income of an assessee has to be determined before the provisions of Section 80T can be applied. This interpretation was consistent with the views of the Gujarat High Court in CIT v. Gautam Sarabhai [1981] 129 ITR 133, the Madras High Court in CIT v. M. Seshasayee [1981] 129 ITR 166, the Bombay High Court in CIT v. Vimla P. Kapadia [1990] 181 ITR 394, and the Calcutta High Court in Gouri Prasad Goenka v. CIT [1991] 190 ITR 81.

The Supreme Court referred to its recent judgment in CIT v. V. Venkatachalam [1993] 201 ITR 737, which held that the words "such income" in the main limb of Section 80T referred to the capital gains and not to the total income of the assessee. The court also cited its judgment in Distributors (Baroda) P. Ltd. v. Union of India [1985] 155 ITR 120, where it was held that the gross total income must be computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act before making any deduction under Chapter VI-A.

The court further noted that Sections 80AA and 80AB, introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980, clarified that deductions should be computed with reference to the income as computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act before making any deductions under Chapter VI-A. This supported the view that the net income chargeable under the head "Capital gains" should be determined after setting off the capital losses from previous years.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court upheld the impugned judgment and order, dismissing the appeal and affirming that the relief under Section 80T should be given only for the amount of capital gains after setting off the capital loss from previous years. The judgment emphasized that the gross total income must be determined in accordance with the provisions of the Act before applying the deductions specified in Section 80T. The court did not express any opinion on the provisions of Section 48 as amended after April 1, 1981, since Section 80T was deleted from the Act with effect from April 1, 1988. There was no order as to costs.