9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Proportional reduction of deduction under section 32AB from the contributions of Foreign Projects for benefits under sections 80HHB and 80-O. Detailed Analysis: 1. Proportional Reduction of Deduction under Section 32AB: The appellant company, a government enterprise under the Ministry of Telecommunication, claimed deductions under sections 80HHB and 80-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for income derived from foreign projects. Additionally, it claimed a deduction under section 32AB for Plant & Machinery purchased during the relevant year. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that since the income from projects eligible for deductions under sections 80-O and 80HHB was included in the gross total income, the proportionate amount of deduction allowable under section 32AB had to be reduced against the income eligible for deductions under sections 80-O and 80HHB. The AO allocated the deduction under section 32AB between Indian and foreign projects proportionately. Upon appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the AO's decision. The appellant contended that the assets purchased for foreign projects were directly charged to the project expenditure and that the deduction under section 32AB should not be allocated against the income from foreign projects eligible for deductions under sections 80-O and 80HHB. The appellant argued that the deductions under sections 80HHB and 80-O should be computed based on eligible profits and gains from foreign projects and royalties received in convertible foreign exchange, respectively. The deduction under section 32AB is restricted to 20% of the gross total income as defined in section 80B(5). The appellant also cited several judgments to support their claim, arguing that the provisions of section 80AB do not support the AO's action of reducing the amount allowable under sections 80HHB and 80-O by allocating the deduction under section 32AB. The learned D.R. argued that deductions under sections 80-O and 80HHB should be allowed only on net income, implying that the deduction under section 32AB should be proportionately reduced from the income eligible for deductions under sections 80HHB and 80-O. The D.R. supported this argument with relevant case law. The Tribunal carefully considered the submissions and relevant case law. It noted that the deduction under section 32AB was allowed based on the total profits of eligible business, including income from foreign projects. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 80AB require that the amount of income eligible for deductions under sections 80HHB and 80-O must be computed in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act before making any deductions under Chapter VI-A. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT(A) rightly confirmed the AO's decision. It held that the proportionate amount of deduction allowed under section 32AB must be deducted for computing the income eligible for deductions under sections 80HHB and 80-O. The allocation method adopted by the AO was deemed reasonable and justified. Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming the proportional reduction of the deduction under section 32AB from the contributions of Foreign Projects for benefits under sections 80HHB and 80-O.
|
