9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act on interest paid to banks on packing loan, export bills, bank charges, and shipping expenses. 2. Interpretation of section 35B(1)(b)(viii) regarding expenditure incurred in connection with export for weighted deduction. Detailed Analysis: 1. The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore dealt with the common issue of weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on various expenses related to exports. The specific items in question were interest paid to banks on packing loans and export bills, bank charges incurred on exports, and shipping expenses including fees for quality certificates and fumigation certificates. The assessee had appealed after being unsuccessful before the lower authorities. 2. Regarding bank charges and shipping expenses, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the grounds raised by the assessee. It was highlighted that bank charges do not qualify for weighted deduction, citing a previous decision of the Special Bench of the Tribunal. This decision was based on the case law of J.H. & Co. v. Second ITO. 3. The focus then shifted to the claim for weighted deduction on interest paid to banks for packing loans and export bills. The Tribunal examined the process of obtaining packing credits, emphasizing that the loans were advanced at subsidized rates of interest by banks to facilitate exports. The assessee argued that such interest payments should be eligible for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(viii) as they were incurred in connection with the export of goods. 4. The assessee contended that the interest paid on packing credit loans was essential for promoting exports, as Indian exporters faced challenges due to high production costs. The Tribunal considered precedents where interest on packing credit had been allowed weighted deduction. However, the departmental representative argued that such interest did not fall within the scope of section 35B(1)(b)(viii) and likened it to export duty and freight charges, which had been denied weighted deduction in previous cases. 5. After evaluating both arguments, the Tribunal concluded that not all export-related expenditures automatically qualified for weighted deduction. It emphasized that interest on packing credit loans did not constitute an expenditure incurred for obtaining credit, as the credit was already secured before interest payments. The Tribunal reasoned that interest paid on such loans did not meet the criteria of section 35B(1)(b)(viii) as it was not akin to after-sales services. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, aligning with the decision of the Karnataka High Court and distinguishing between different types of loans and eligible expenditures for weighted deduction.
|
