Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal Experts This

LEGAL TERMINOLOGY IN GST LAW (PART 12)

Submit New Article

Discuss this article

LEGAL TERMINOLOGY IN GST LAW (PART 12)
Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
March 15, 2025
All Articles by: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal       View Profile
  • Contents

Meaning of ‘Compounding’

‘Compounding’ has not been defined in GST Act or Rules. However, ‘Compounding’ means payment of monetary compensation or fine, instead of undergoing prosecution for an offence committed, which warrants such prosecution.

Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure defines ‘compounding’ as to forbear from prosecution for consideration or any private motive. Aiyar’s Law Lexicon defines it variously as “arranging, coming to terms; condone for money”. Compounding is thus, a legally recognized arrangement, whereby the person charged with an offence is offered the option of avoiding prosecution and imprisonment in lieu of monetary considerations by way of penalty; compounding is essentially a contract between the state and the offender whereby the state secures revenue and the offender secures immunity from prosecution.

Compounding is nothing but a sort of compromise between the offender and the department to avoid criminal proceedings and is a punishment outside the court proceedings. Oxford Dictionary defines it as ‘forbear from prosecuting in exchange for money or other consideration; condone for money’. Compoundable offence is an offence which the law allows to be compounded between the parties; an offence which is capable of being compounded.

The offence of accepting or agreeing to accept consideration for not disclosing information that might assist in convicting or prosecuting someone who has committed an arrestable offence (consideration here does not include reasonable compensation for loss or injury caused by the offence). There is also a special statutory offence of advertising a reward for stolen goods on the basis that no question will be asked or that the person producing the goods ‘will be safe from inquiry’(England) Oxford Law Dictionary, 5th Edn, 2003).

Compounding is a compromise arrangement between administrator of statute and the person who has committed an offence. Compounding involves receipt of consideration in return of non-prosecution of person who has committed an offence (1997) 24 CLA 214 (CLB).

Compounding results in dropping of prosecution proceedings and once the offence is compounded, penalty or prosecution proceedings cannot be taken up for same offence. Compounding order cannot be challenged by either of the parties and appeal against such order does not lie. Such matters cannot be revived or reopened. Compounding is not a right but discretion of the compounding authority.

In STATE OF ANDHRA (NOW ANDHRA PRADESH) VERSUS BELLAMKONDA VENKATA SUBBAIAH AND ANOTHER - 1956 (12) TMI 35 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT, it was held that compounding of an offence at the request of the defaulter party is neither an agreement nor a contract. It is a sort of compromise between the two parties ie defaulter/offender and the revenue department.

According to Ramnath Aiyar’s Law Lexicon, ‘compounding’ means “arranging, coming to terms, condone for money” whereas Oxford Dictionary defines ‘compounding’ means “forbear from prosecuting in exchange for money or other consideration, condone for money. Generally, in common parlance compounding termed as “to settle a matter by a money payment, in lieu of other liability”.

Scope of compoundable offences (sub-section 1)

Any offence under CGST Act may, either before or after the institution of prosecution, be compounded by the Commissioner on payment, by the person accused of the offence, to the Central Government or the State Government, as the case be, of such compounding amount in such manner as may be prescribed.

As per section 138(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, any offence under the Act may, either before or after the institution of prosecution, be compounded by the Commissioner on payment, by the person accused of the offence, to the Central Government or the State Government, as the case be, of such compounding amount in such manner as may be prescribed.

Thus, compounding of offences can be done:

(a)  by the Commissioner,

(b)  on payment of compounding amount,

(c)  either before or after the institution of prosecution,

(d) in the prescribed manner.

It may be noted that payment should be made by the person (accused of the offence) to the Central Government or State Government in respect of CGST or SGST respectively. However, such compounding is subject to certain exceptions and conditions.

Conditions for compounding (Sub-section 1)

Proviso to sub-section 1 provides that:

  1. any compounding allowed under the provisions of this section shall not affect the proceedings, if any, instituted under any other law.
  2. compounding shall be allowed only after making payment of tax, interest and penalty involved in such offences.

Amount payable on compounding

Compounding of offences shall be allowed only after payment of tax, interest and penalty in respect of offences being compounded has been made by the taxable person.

Power of compounding

Commissioner under the CGST/SGST/UTGST law will determine the amount for compounding of offences, which shall be within the minimum and maximum amounts as per section 138(2).

 

By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal - March 15, 2025

 

 

Discuss this article

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates