Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + AT Wealth-tax - 1981 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1981 (2) TMI 103 - AT - Wealth-tax

Issues:
Interpretation of a Will regarding the roles of executors and trustees post-distribution.

Analysis:
The case involved the interpretation of a Will executed by Arthur John Davis, appointing executors who were to act as trustees. The Will outlined various provisions, including the distribution of movable properties to his wife, directions for payments to be made by the executors, and the creation of a trust for the residue of the estate. The main issue was whether the executors had transitioned into trustees after completing the specified tasks mentioned in the Will.

The WTO assessed the executors under section 19A of the WT Act, considering them still in their role. However, the AAC ruled that the executors had become trustees after completing the administration of the estate, directing fresh assessments under section 21 of the WT Act due to determinate beneficiaries.

The Revenue argued that the executors had not shed their character as executors, citing the incomplete administration of the estate as per the Will's provisions. They relied on a decision of the Madras High Court to support their position.

The assessee's advocate contended that the executors had fulfilled their duties as per the Will, transitioning into trustees thereafter. They argued that the trust had been created, and the beneficiaries were determined, supporting the AAC's order.

The ITAT held that the executors had indeed become trustees after completing the specified tasks in the Will. The language of the Will, particularly clause X, indicated the transition from executors to trustees, with clear mention of a trust and beneficiaries. They distinguished the Madras High Court decision, emphasizing that the circumstances in the present case differed, leading to the executors' transition into trustees.

Ultimately, the ITAT upheld the AAC's order, concluding that the assessments were wrongly made under section 19A, and section 21 was applicable. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the executors' transition into trustees post-administration of the estate.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates