Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2006 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (1) TMI 168 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Treatment of additional income declared during survey as business income for allowing remuneration to partners.
2. Correct valuation of stock during survey and its impact on assessment under section 263.

Issue 1:
The appeal focused on whether the additional income of Rs. 5 lakhs declared by the assessee during a survey could be considered as business income for the purpose of allowing remuneration to partners. The AO had denied the claim, stating it was not business income. However, the ITAT held that the undisclosed income found during the survey directly related to the business activities of the assessee. The Tribunal referred to a similar case where income disclosed during a survey was treated as business income, allowing remuneration to partners. As the additional income was not assessed under any other head, the ITAT directed the AO to allow the claim, ultimately allowing the appeal.

Issue 2:
The second appeal dealt with the correct valuation of stock during a survey and its impact on the assessment under section 263. The CIT had initiated proceedings under section 263 based on discrepancies in the valuation of gold stock during the survey compared to the closing stock value in the books. The assessee argued that the valuation at the time of survey considered gold not owned solely by the assessee, leading to the difference in value. The ITAT examined the inventory prepared during the survey, which showed the weight and rate of gold recorded by the survey team. The ITAT found that the valuation discrepancy highlighted by the CIT was unfounded, as the assessee had correctly valued the closing stock at a different rate. Since the additional stock value had already been offered as income and accepted during assessment, the ITAT concluded that there was no valid reason for initiating section 263 proceedings. Consequently, the ITAT canceled the order under section 263 and allowed the appeal.

In conclusion, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee in both appeals, directing the AO to allow the claim related to additional income and canceling the order under section 263 regarding the valuation of stock during the survey.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates