9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1987 (4) TMI 99 - AT - Income TaxAppeal To AAC, Assessment Order, Association Of Persons, Beneficiaries Unknown, Discretionary Trust, Rate Purpose
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the AAC erred in entertaining the appeal against an order under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act. 2. Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80L of the Income-tax Act. 3. Determination of the correct status of the assessee (individual or AOP) for tax purposes. 4. Interpretation of section 80L of the Income-tax Act. 5. Application of section 164(1) of the Income-tax Act regarding the status of the assessee. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Whether the AAC erred in entertaining the appeal against an order under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act: The department argued that the AAC erred in entertaining the appeal against an order under section 143(1) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had submitted a claim for deduction under section 80L before the ITO, who rejected the claim without giving an opportunity to the assessee. Consequently, although the assessment order mentioned section 143(1), it was in substance made under section 143(3) because it involved the rejection of a claim. Therefore, the AAC was justified in entertaining the appeal, and the first ground of the department was rejected. 2. Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80L of the Income-tax Act: The AAC held that the appellant was entitled to the deduction under section 80L. However, this decision was challenged by the department. The Tribunal noted that the AAC did not record a clear finding on whether the status of the assessee was that of an individual or an AOP, which was necessary to determine the eligibility for the deduction under section 80L. The Tribunal concluded that the real status of the assessee trust needed to be determined to decide on the deduction. 3. Determination of the correct status of the assessee (individual or AOP) for tax purposes: The Tribunal analyzed whether the assessee trust should be assessed as an individual or an AOP. It referred to section 164(1) of the Income-tax Act, which states that tax shall be charged on the relevant income as if it were the total income of an AOP. The Tribunal concluded that the trustees should be assessed in the status of an AOP due to the deeming provision in section 164(1), despite the argument that there cannot be an AOP unless two or more persons join in a common purpose or action with the object of producing income. 4. Interpretation of section 80L of the Income-tax Act: Section 80L allows deductions for certain types of income, including dividends, for individuals, Hindu undivided families, and specific associations of persons or bodies of individuals. The Tribunal noted that due to the retrospective amendment made by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, clause (c) of section 80L(1) applies only if the association of persons or body of individuals consists only of husband and wife governed by the system of community property in specific Union territories. Since the assessee did not fall under this category, the deduction under section 80L was not allowable. 5. Application of section 164(1) of the Income-tax Act regarding the status of the assessee: The Tribunal examined the legal implications of section 164(1) and concluded that the trustees of the assessee trust should be assessed in the status of an AOP. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Smt. Santimoyee Bose v. CIT, which held that representative assessees could be assessed as an AOP due to the deeming provision, even if they did not form an association to produce income. The Tribunal rejected the view that trustees should be assessed as individuals for assessment purposes and only treated as an AOP for rate purposes. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the department's appeals (I.T.A. Nos. 3424/Bom/1984 and 3425/Bom/1984) and dismissed the cross-objections (C.O. Nos. 390/Bom/1984 and 391/Bom/1984). It also dismissed the assessee's appeals (I.T.A. Nos. 6064/Bom/1984, 6065/Bom/1984, and 6066/Bom/1984). The Tribunal held that the assessee trusts were assessable in the status of an AOP and not as individuals, and therefore, the deduction under section 80L was not allowable.
|
