9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the assessment order dated 31-7-2000 was barred by limitation. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Validity of notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The first ground of appeal pertains to the confirmation by the learned CIT(A) of the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This ground of appeal was not seriously contested on behalf of the assessee. The Honourable Bombay High Court upheld the validity of the proceedings initiated under section 147 and the issue of notice under section 148. Consequently, the finding of the learned CIT(A) on this issue is confirmed. Issue 2: Whether the assessment order dated 31-7-2000 was barred by limitation. The assessee, an individual and proprietor of two concerns, filed the original return of income for the assessment year 1994-95 on 27-10-1994. The return was processed under section 143(1)(a) on 20-12-1994, and subsequently, an assessment under section 143 was made. A survey conducted under section 133A on 23-10-1997 revealed that income chargeable to tax escaped assessment due to a wrong deduction under section 80-IA. Consequently, a notice under section 148 was issued on 18-3-1998, and served on the assessee on 25-3-1998. The assessee filed a writ petition challenging the notice, which was dismissed by the High Court on 22-2-2000, with a further stay granted for four weeks. The SLP filed by the assessee was dismissed on 17-4-2000. The main contention revolves around whether the bar of limitation is governed under section 153(2) read with clause (ii) of Explanation 1 or under section 153(3) as contended by the Revenue authorities. The learned counsel for the assessee argued that the High Court's order dismissing the writ petition did not contain any finding or direction necessitating the reassessment. The reassessment was pursuant to the notice under section 148 issued on 18-3-1998, and not by reason of the High Court's order dated 22-2-2000. The learned CIT(A) dismissed the ground of appeal raised by the assessee, holding that the assessment/reassessment was in consequence of the findings given by the Honourable High Court, and therefore, the provisions of section 153(3) were applicable. The learned CIT/DR supported this view, arguing that the High Court's order contained specific findings and directions, making section 153(3) applicable. The Tribunal, however, held that the High Court's order dismissing the writ petition cannot be said to contain any finding or direction. The High Court merely upheld the validity of the notice under section 148, allowing the Assessing Officer to proceed with the reassessment. The Tribunal concluded that section 153(3) was not applicable, and the reassessment was governed by section 153(2) read with Explanation 1(ii). The period during which the assessment proceeding was stayed by the High Court was to be excluded from the limitation period. The Tribunal further held that the Limitation Act, 1963, was not applicable to the Income-tax Act, 1961, which is a self-contained code. The provisions of section 12(2) of the Limitation Act, which exclude the time taken for obtaining a copy of the court's order from the limitation period, were not applicable to assessment proceedings. Consequently, the reassessment made on 31-7-2000 was barred by limitation, and the assessment order was quashed. Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, and the assessment order dated 31-7-2000 was quashed on the grounds that it was barred by limitation. The Tribunal held that the reassessment was governed by section 153(2) read with Explanation 1(ii) and not by section 153(3), as there was no finding or direction in the High Court's order necessitating the reassessment.
|
