1964 (2) TMI 4 - SC - Income Tax

Whether the proceedings before an Income-tax Officer under section 37 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (XI of 1922) can be said to be a proceeding in any court within the meaning of section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure? Held that - We are not prepared to accept the appellant s argument that the Bombay High Court was in error in dismissing his complaint on the ground that the condition precedent prescribed by section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure had not been complied with as no complaint had been filed by the Income-tax Officer. Appeal dismissed.

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the proceedings before an Income-tax Officer under section 37 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, are proceedings in any court within the meaning of section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. Whether the Income-tax Officer is a court within the meaning of section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Proceedings Before Income-tax Officer as Judicial Proceedings
The core issue is whether the proceedings before an Income-tax Officer under section 37 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, can be considered as proceedings in any court under section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellant filed a criminal complaint alleging that false statements were made by the respondent during income-tax assessment proceedings. The respondent argued that the proceedings were before a court, and hence, a complaint should have been made by the Income-tax Officer as per section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The Supreme Court examined the powers conferred upon the Income-tax Officer under section 37 of the Act, which include powers similar to those of a court under the Code of Civil Procedure, such as discovery and inspection, enforcing attendance, compelling production of documents, and issuing commissions. Section 37(4) explicitly states that proceedings before the Income-tax Officer are deemed judicial proceedings within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code.

Issue 2: Income-tax Officer as a Court
The Supreme Court explored whether an Income-tax Officer could be considered a court under section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The judgment noted that section 193 of the Indian Penal Code distinguishes between false evidence given in judicial proceedings and other proceedings, with harsher penalties for the former. The Court recognized that section 37(4) makes proceedings before the Income-tax Officer judicial proceedings for the purposes of section 193 of the Indian Penal Code.

The Court also examined the legislative intent and the statutory language. It was noted that while section 37(4) made the proceedings judicial for certain purposes, it did not explicitly state that the Income-tax Officer was a court. The Court referred to other statutes where explicit language was used to deem certain authorities as courts for the purposes of section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, indicating that the absence of such language in section 37(4) was deliberate.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court concluded that the proceedings before the Income-tax Officer are judicial proceedings under section 193 of the Indian Penal Code. However, these proceedings are not in a court within the meaning of section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court upheld the Bombay High Court's decision that the complaint filed by the appellant should be dismissed, as no complaint had been filed by the Income-tax Officer.

The judgment emphasized that the legislative intent was to provide a higher penalty for false evidence in judicial proceedings but did not intend to extend the procedural safeguard of requiring a complaint from the court itself for proceedings before an Income-tax Officer. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the Presidency Magistrate's decision to take cognizance of the complaint without a written complaint from the Income-tax Officer was deemed incorrect.

← Previous Next →