2006 (3) TMI 201 - AT - Income Tax

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Deduction under Section 80HHC for export-oriented units.
2. Classification of sales as local sales or export turnover.
3. Treatment of export incentives and margin money.
4. Inclusion of certain incomes (interest from banks, interest on loans, insurance claims) in business income for deduction purposes.

Issue-wise Analysis:

1. Deduction under Section 80HHC for export-oriented units:
The assessee contested the restriction of deduction under Section 80HHC by the CIT(A) to Rs. 47,08,796 instead of the claimed Rs. 83,00,505. The assessee argued that being wholly engaged in export business, all income under "Profits and gains of business or profession" should be exempt under Section 80HHC(3)(a). The CIT(A) held that the deduction is available on profits derived from export of goods or merchandise, receivable in convertible foreign exchange. The export turnover was determined to be Rs. 8,75,24,182, not Rs. 14,53,90,901 as claimed. The incentive received from local sales of goods imported under duty-free licenses was not excludable from total turnover. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, stating that only income derived from export business qualifies for deduction under Section 80HHC.

2. Classification of sales as local sales or export turnover:
The assessee treated branch sales of Rs. 5,75,29,284 as export turnover, arguing that these were goods transferred to actual users under a duty-free import license scheme. The AO treated these as local sales, including them in the total turnover for calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC. The CIT(A) and Tribunal agreed, noting that the sale proceeds must be received in convertible foreign exchange to qualify as export turnover. The Tribunal further emphasized that the sale of imported goods to local users was an incidental receipt, not derived from export business.

3. Treatment of export incentives and margin money:
The assessee argued that the margin money from importing goods under an advance license and reselling them locally should be considered as recoupment of purchase cost and exempt as export incentive under Section 28 read with Sections 2(24) and 80HHC. The AO and CIT(A) disagreed, treating these transactions as local sales. The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the sale of imported goods was incidental and not derived from export business. The Tribunal also accepted the alternate contention that only items/products considered for export turnover should be included in total turnover, referencing the Madras High Court decision in CIT vs. Madras Motors Ltd.

4. Inclusion of certain incomes in business income for deduction purposes:
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision to treat receipts from bank interest, interest on loans, and insurance claims as business income for calculating deduction under Section 80HHC. The AO had classified these as "other income." The CIT(A) held that these receipts should be treated as business income, considering the assessee's status as a 100% export-oriented unit. The Tribunal referred to the Special Bench decision in Lalsons Enterprises vs. Dy. CIT, which allows for net interest (after set-off of interest paid) to be considered for deduction purposes. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO for fresh consideration, providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order regarding the classification of sales and treatment of export incentives but accepted the assessee's alternate contention on turnover calculation. The issue of including certain incomes in business income was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration. The appeal of the assessee was allowed in part, and the Revenue's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.