9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Appeal against denial of deduction under s. 80-I for manufacturing computer software for general purpose. Analysis: 1. The assessee claimed deduction under s. 80-I for manufacturing computer software named Devyani Project. AO denied the claim stating that the activity did not qualify as manufacturing or production under s. 80-I(2)(iii). 2. CIT(A) affirmed AO's decision, stating that the software was developed, not manufactured, and did not result in the production of an article or thing. 3. Assessee argued that the software qualified as an industrial undertaking under s. 80-I, fulfilling all conditions. The software enabled computers to work in various languages and was used for printing newspapers, magazines, and books. 4. Assessee presented evidence including certificates, delivery challans, and product displays to establish the software as a product in itself, marketed for clients' use. Reference was made to a Supreme Court decision on software categorization. 5. Revenue contended that the software development did not constitute manufacturing activity as no tangible article was produced. 6. ITAT examined the case, considering the definition of "industry" and the emergence of a distinct product through systematic activity. Citing relevant case law, ITAT concluded that the software qualified as a branded software package marketed as a product, eligible for deduction under s. 80-I. 7. Referring to the Supreme Court's decision on software categorization, ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s findings, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee. 8. The ITAT's decision was based on the software being a standardized and marketed product, meeting the criteria for deduction under s. 80-I of the IT Act. 9. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, overturning the denial of the deduction under s. 80-I.
|
