9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of deduction on account of debts/loans and advances written off. 2. Treatment of profit on sale of shares of Bangalore Stock Exchange. 3. Disallowance of losses incurred in share transactions. 4. Disallowance of special brokerage paid. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Disallowance of Deduction on Account of Debts/Loans and Advances Written Off: The assessee appealed against the disallowance of Rs. 26,50,168 claimed as deduction for debts/loans and advances written off. The amounts disallowed included: - Ramachandra Rane: Rs. 36,725 - Amritlal Bajaj & Co.: Rs. 78,358 - Nikil Traders: Rs. 45,000 (not pressed by the assessee) - Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd.: Rs. 24,90,085 For Ramachandra Rane, the assessee argued that the amount should be deductible as a business loss. The Tribunal agreed, stating that commercial expediency justified the deduction, and directed the deduction of Rs. 36,725. Regarding Amritlal Bajaj & Co., the Tribunal found that the transactions were recorded in the books of account and no contrary evidence was provided by the Assessing Officer. Thus, the Tribunal directed the deduction of Rs. 78,358. For Dhanraj Mills Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal noted that the company was notified by the Special Court under the Special Court Ordinance, 1992, and had a huge income-tax liability. The Tribunal held that the loss was in the ordinary course of business and directed the deduction of Rs. 24,90,085 as a business loss. 2. Treatment of Profit on Sale of Shares of Bangalore Stock Exchange: The assessee claimed that the profit of Rs. 13,70,000 from the sale of shares of Bangalore Stock Exchange was a long-term capital gain. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) treated it as business income, arguing that the share was not shown as an investment in the books of account and was related to the right to do business. The Tribunal, upon further hearing and considering the affidavit filed by the assessee, concluded that the share in Bangalore Stock Exchange was a capital asset. The Tribunal held that the share was held for more than 12 months and directed that the profit be treated as long-term capital gain. 3. Disallowance of Losses Incurred in Share Transactions: The assessee claimed losses of Rs. 1,53,500 and Rs. 9,00,710 from share transactions. The Assessing Officer disallowed these losses, questioning the genuineness of the transactions and treating them as speculative losses. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not provide adequate material to prove that the transactions were not genuine. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the transactions and, if found genuine, to allow the losses as speculative losses to be adjusted against future speculative profits. 4. Disallowance of Special Brokerage Paid: The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 2,00,000 paid as special brokerage to Shri J.P. Merchant and M/s. J.R. Motishaw. The Tribunal noted that this issue was covered in favor of the assessee by an earlier order of the ITAT for the assessment year 1991-92. Following the same, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction. Separate Judgment by Judicial Member on Issue 2: The Judicial Member disagreed with the Accountant Member regarding the treatment of the profit on the sale of shares of Bangalore Stock Exchange. The Judicial Member held that the asset was a short-term capital asset as it was held for less than 36 months and was related to the right to do business. The matter was referred to a Third Member. Third Member's Decision: The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member, concluding that the share in Bangalore Stock Exchange was a long-term capital asset held for more than 12 months. The profit from its sale was to be treated as long-term capital gain.
|
