9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Disallowance of UK lb 430 as expenses incurred in connection with the sale of shares and debentures. Issue 1: Levy of Interest under Sections 234B and 234C The main controversy requiring adjudication was whether the CIT(A) was justified in confirming the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 1,24,638 and Rs. 2,52,499 respectively. The assessee, a non-resident company, had returned income under the head capital gains and other sources, aggregating to Rs. 1,69,62,578. The controversy arose when the assessee's cheque for advance tax dated 10th March, 1994, was cleared only on 16th April, 1994. The assessee contended that since the cheque was deposited on 15th March, 1994, they were not liable to pay interest under sections 234B and 234C. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that the payment of Rs. 83,25,820 could be considered made only on 15th April, 1994, thus making the assessee liable for interest under sections 234B and 234C. The Assessing Officer, relying on this ruling, levied the interest, which was upheld by the CIT(A). However, the Tribunal noted that under section 245S of the Act, the advance ruling is binding but only on the specific question posed. The question was whether the amount paid by cheque dated 10th March, 1994, should be considered for computing interest on delay and deferment of advance tax payments. The Tribunal held that the ruling implied the payment was made on 15th April, 1994, and thus, should be ignored for computing interest under sections 234B and 234C. The Tribunal further examined the provisions of section 209(1)(d), which mandates reducing the amount of tax deductible at source from the estimated tax liability for computing advance tax payable. Since the entire tax liability of the non-resident assessee should have been deducted at source under section 195, there was no advance tax liability, and hence, no interest under sections 234B and 234C was applicable. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute the advance tax payable by the assessee as per the scheme of section 209, reducing the tax deductible at source from the estimated tax liability. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C, and allowed this ground of appeal. Issue 2: Disallowance of UK lb 430 as Expenses The second grievance was regarding the disallowance of UK lb 430, being expenses incurred in connection with the sale of shares and debentures of Rallis. The expenses were payments to ANZ International Merchant Banking for traveling expenses and allowances. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenditure due to lack of evidence, and the CIT(A) upheld this disallowance. The Tribunal, after hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material, found that adequate material had been furnished by the assessee, including copies of relevant invoices and the agreement under which payments were made. The Tribunal noted that the authorities below were unsatisfied because vouchers supporting the expenses incurred by ANZ International Merchant Banking were not furnished. However, the Tribunal held that the factum of expenditure, genuineness, and purpose of the expense were clearly established by the assessee. Thus, the Tribunal deemed it fit to delete the disallowance of UK lb 430 and allowed this ground of appeal. Conclusion: In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C, and deleted the disallowance of UK lb 430 as expenses.
|
